On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:18:33 +0200Updated, you don't have to build SWR from sources anymore.
Karel Piwko <kpiwko@redhat.com> wrote:
> Thank Corinne,
>
> nice catch! I'll update to 2.0.0-beta-5, as soon as it will hit Maven Central,
> it was released today, so this step would not be necessary at all.
>
> Karel
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:27:20 +0200
> Corinne Krych <corinnekrych@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Karel,
> >
> > I had a look at your repo on how to setup spock test with arquillian. I've
> > run into a mvn dependency issue. I had to replace:
> > https://github.com/kpiwko/pushee-integration-tests/blob/master/pom.xml#L20
> > ie:
> > <version.org.jboss.shrinkwrap.resolver>2.0.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT
> > </version.org.jboss.shrinkwrap.resolver>
> > by
> > <version.org.jboss.shrinkwrap.resolver>2.0.0-cr-1-SNAPSHOT</version.org.jboss.shrinkwrap.resolver>
> >
> >
> > BTW +1 for having test into src/it it's always good to keep test close to
> > src.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Corinne
> >
> >
> > On 22 May 2013 15:52, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for #3 (Spock ftw !!)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Bruno Oliveira
> > > <bruno@abstractj.org>wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 for option 3
> > >>
> > >> Karel Piwko wrote:
> > >> > 3/ Have them in separate repository - that's Matthias option
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev