On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
What do you think about tag the current version and merge the security
branch? Only if you want to we also can release the version 0.1.0 on
maven central.

are u talking about the REST API doc (this thread)
or the (real :-)) work I did for security branch ? 
 

Just let me know.

Karel Piwko wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:26:26 +0200
> Sebastien Blanc<scm.blanc@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> +9006
>> And we should check that the integrations tests are always in sync with the
>> cookbook (use the same use cases / data) .
>
> Asciidoc provides a nice feature of including snippets of code from real
> files into documentation. Not sure if that would be possible with making groovy
> syntax for integration tests nicely fitting cookbook syntax, but might be worth
> investigating ;-)
>
>
>> Seb
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Matthias Wessendorf<matzew@apache.org>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Karel Piwko<kpiwko@redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:22:10 +0200
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf<matzew@apache.org>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> a little doc about the REST endpoints:
>>>>> https://gist.github.com/matzew/73ec38d853863e7bb1dd
>>>> Extremely helpful, thanks! I wish I'd found it before I was wondering why
>>>> unified push server started returning 201 instead of 200.
>>>>
>>>>> I _think_ it would be nice IF the above "REST APIs" are also describing
>>>> the
>>>>> "params" and HTTP headers that are required.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are currently (at least for sending) described in here:
>>>>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-push-messages/
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>> Should we merge the "message format" spec with the "Sender REST-API"
>>>>> endpoint documentation?
>>>> Wouldn't they make a nice cookbook together if merged?
>>>>
>>> +1000
>>>
>>> I am currently on some security work, but I plan to merge the "message
>>> format + REST API"
>>>
>>> I think in three different "chapters"
>>> * REST Management APIs (for creating PushApplication / Variant) (+ crud
>>> workflow ->  basically all used by the (future) Admin UI)
>>> * REST Auth Endpoint (Login/Logout and "enroll")
>>> * REST Sender (for sending push messages)
>>> * REST "Device Registration" (for the MobileVariantInstances (aka
>>> Installations))
>>>
>>> That ensure the doc is not too long.....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Also, if we do the merge.... I'd update the above gist to include other
>>>>> values/headers/params for the
>>>>> MobileVariant/PushApplication/Installation(aka MobileVariantInstance) as
>>>>> well
>>>>>
>>>>>   -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--
abstractj

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf