Yes, the work from the security branch.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org
> <mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote:> > Sebastien Blanc<scm.blanc@gmail.com <mailto:scm.blanc@gmail.com>>
>
> What do you think about tag the current version and merge the security
> branch? Only if you want to we also can release the version 0.1.0 on
> maven central.
>
>
> are u talking about the REST API doc (this thread)
> or the (real :-)) work I did for security branch ?
>
>
> Just let me know.
>
> Karel Piwko wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:26:26 +0200
> wrote:> Wessendorf<matzew@apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>>wrote:
> >
> >> +9006
> >> And we should check that the integrations tests are always in
> sync with the
> >> cookbook (use the same use cases / data) .
> >
> > Asciidoc provides a nice feature of including snippets of code
> from real
> > files into documentation. Not sure if that would be possible with
> making groovy
> > syntax for integration tests nicely fitting cookbook syntax, but
> might be worth
> > investigating ;-)
> >
> >
> >> Seb
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Matthias
> <mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:22:10 +0200
> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf<matzew@apache.org
> >>>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> a little doc about the REST endpoints:
> >>>>> https://gist.github.com/matzew/73ec38d853863e7bb1dd
> >>>> Extremely helpful, thanks! I wish I'd found it before I was
> wondering why
> >>>> unified push server started returning 201 instead of 200.
> >>>>
> >>>>> I _think_ it would be nice IF the above "REST APIs" are also
> describing
> >>>> the
> >>>>> "params" and HTTP headers that are required.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These are currently (at least for sending) described in here:
> >>>>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-push-messages/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>> Should we merge the "message format" spec with the "Sender
> REST-API"
> >>>>> endpoint documentation?
> >>>> Wouldn't they make a nice cookbook together if merged?
> >>>>
> >>> +1000
> >>>
> >>> I am currently on some security work, but I plan to merge the
> "message
> >>> format + REST API"
> >>>
> >>> I think in three different "chapters"
> >>> * REST Management APIs (for creating PushApplication / Variant)
> (+ crud
> >>> workflow -> basically all used by the (future) Admin UI)
> >>> * REST Auth Endpoint (Login/Logout and "enroll")
> >>> * REST Sender (for sending push messages)
> >>> * REST "Device Registration" (for the MobileVariantInstances (aka
> >>> Installations))
> >>>
> >>> That ensure the doc is not too long.....
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> Also, if we do the merge.... I'd update the above gist to
> include other
> >>>>> values/headers/params for the
> >>>>> MobileVariant/PushApplication/Installation(aka
> MobileVariantInstance) as
> >>>>> well
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Matthias
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev> >>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>
> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev> > aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >>>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
> --
> abstractj
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev