On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit@redhat.com> wrote:

overall I am not against changes for 1.1.x, on our master branch. Here is something that Sebi mentioned a few month ago: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-534

right I like this as well, but here the users data is also mixed with the message, that was the point.


With some API change, coming up, let's not forget about "REST API Versioning", he discussed at our Face2Face meeting: http://oksoclap.com/p/jbrS1EHWkI
(looks like in that session the majority preferred headers over URI).

We have to support the 1.0.0 APIs for quite a while.

Sure, but because we have a version can’t mean that we cannot change things I hope.

nah, not at all :-) That's why we discussed 'REST API Versioning' at the meeting
 
We just need to have a good mechanism inlace to maintain these versions. 


yep, I'd say once that is in place, we can look at changing APIs  



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf