>I have some experience supporting both, so we can look at it later for
>sure, but IMO not a priority now
Cool, sounds good to me!

Thanks

On 27 September 2012 18:28, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
I'd say no, let's keep it 6 for now

reason: only early adopters got jdk7, and there are bugs still.

I have some experience supporting both, so we can look at it later for
sure, but IMO not a priority now

-- qmx (mobile)

On 27/09/2012, at 13:21, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I just wanted to ask if there is anything stopping us from using Java 1.7 instead of 1.6 in aerogear-controller?
>
> There are a few things that might be nice to use, the main one I was thinking about was using method handles instead of reflection.
>
> cheers,
>
> /Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev