Agreed but we should make that clear in the clients (Java and Node) when receiving the response (I'm thinking about the callbacks) , that said, an javadoc/comment should de enough.

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 3 févr. 2015 à 22:13, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> a écrit :

Hi,

I recently noticed that we are (IMO) incorrectly returning 200 (OK):
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/jaxrs/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/rest/sender/PushNotificationSenderEndpoint.java#L112-L113

Since we really do submit an async job here, and its processing may not have been started when we do return the 200 (OK), I'd like to propose a slight change here to instead use 202 (Accepted):

http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.2.3

If the team is OK (ha ha) with this, I will track this in JIRA

-Matthias

--
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev