On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Passos <daniel@passos.me> wrote:
We don't isolate it in a separate project, push is part of the library
android. wdyt about it?

what ever works for you guys, is fine for me as well.

I have no personal preference

 

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych@gmail.com
> <mailto:corinnekrych@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Are we going to do the same for Android//JS then?
>
>
> The JS builds are able to ship "isolated".
>
> On Android, we can stick to the current model, IMO
>
> -M
>
>
>     ++
>     Corinne
>
>     On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org
>     <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>>     Alright, as mentioned yesterday in the team meeting:
>>
>>     the push sdk will be modular, like the OTP-iOS
>>
>>     So, nothing here changes.
>>
>>     btw. Later this week we will see a version going to CocoaPods
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
>>     <matzew@apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>         I also agree on keeping it, as it is
>>
>>
>>         On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Bruno Oliveira
>>         <bruno@abstractj.org <mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote:
>>
>>             +1 brodular
>>
>>             Douglas Campos wrote:
>>             > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:03:06AM +0200, Matthias
>>             Wessendorf wrote:
>>             >> [ ] Include the Push bits in the AeroGear-iOS lib
>>             >> [ ] Keep the Push SDK separated
>>             > +1 - the more modular the merrier :)
>>             >
>>
>>             --
>>             abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf