Thanks for raising that question - I think it's really important to talk about it. 
I think we had the similar conversation 6 months ago when kickstarting RainCatcher docs.

Personally I think is essential for every project to have his own landing sub page (with documentation,demo video etc.) that can be accessed easily from feedhenry, aerogear main web pages.
In RainCatcher we went even further and created separate web page (that is linked in 
This works pretty well as documentation, getting started etc. is exposed directly on the main page.

I think that has really good layout itself when listing all projects. We could just provide less information so people looking for something specific will not need to scroll too much. 
Spring (any many other aggregating communities) do the same. For example:

We can apply similar list to aerogear website - however I'm not aware of the impact or challenges in that area)

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Paul Wright <> wrote:

Hi AeroGear, FeedHenry

As part of a review of Digger (Build Farm) docs,  I created a PR to attempt to improve user navigation of:

Feedback on that PR raised the question of general navigation of this web site:

* What should be in the Getting Started menu to help me get started with digger? (I think digger is more than a code snippet or library)

* If I'm interested in digger, should I expect any digger info under module or platform menu items?

* I sometimes navigate to a page, but can't remember how I navigated to it, then cannot find the info again.

These issues can be resolved, but will require a lot of effort, but another question is:

* Will it provide us a platform to build the community we want?

The web site looks great, and I learn a lot from browsing it (eg I didn't know about until today), but I wonder if it is doing the job we want it to do? and how do we keep it up-to-date? (

Meanwhile over at:

Not much there at the moment, but it will be the location for doc

* Do we want users switching from MCP doc on over to digger doc on and back again for some fh.sync doc?

These are difficult and challenging questions, I don't expect them to be easy to resolve and I'm happy to agree with whatever the communities decide to do. All this mail hopes to do is to raise the question of

* How do we communicate the "" (i.e. feedhenry mcp and aerogear digger) message as cleanly as possible?

(The real challenge occurs after that, convincing them to adopt, but users will never adopt if they can't find answers  they hit the first stumbling block)



feedhenry-dev mailing list



Red Hat Mobile

IM: wtrocki