On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all,
as we approach 2.0 releases in iOS we are evaluating the faith of our 1.x repository [1]. Currently the functionality has been splitted in separate repositories[2][3] with more to come in subsequent releases . Since other platforms follow the same approach of separation, would like to get your view on how you will handle the ‘1.x’ repo?
We were thinking to:
a) promote the master repo to an '1.x branch’ and update the repos README.md to be clear that is our 1.x branch
b) use the ‘master’ branch with just a single README.md that provides links to the different repos.Do you mean, the repo in [1] will be just a readme, linking to all the different 'modules'? If so, +1 on that
Wdyth?
-
Christos
[1] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios
[2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-http
[3] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-oauth2
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev