that original order is also fine w/ me;



On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych@gmail.com> wrote:
Good point previous site was listed as:
*JS
* iOS
* android
* hybrid
which I think was a good order because it's ordered per category web vs native.

I didn't really pay attention to the changes order tbh, let's fix!

++
Corinne

On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:



On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,

I was wondering about something...

the list:
* iOS
* Android
* Web
* Hybrid

Not sure, but I *think* some folks may (want) to read that iOS has higher prio over Android, Android over JS/Web etc....

I tend to list by alphabet to avoid those 'discussions' :-)

So my 'politically correct' list would be like:
* Android
* Hybrid
* iOS
* Web


does that make sense - or should we not even worry about those incorrect 'misinterpretations' ? 


--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf