So let's just name it @aerogear_forever!
—
abstractj


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Jay Balunas <tech4j@gmail.com> wrote:


On Feb 21, 2014, at 12:59 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:




On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
I still can't see what the real value added on it. Everyone knows that there's a team behind it, so I can't see why "_team", also do we plan to create handles for "AeroGearPush", "AeroGearSecurity"...if yes,

not sure on all these twitter handles. I'd vote -1 on all these accounts

+1 on the -1 for additional handles.


 
that makes sense. And "_project", well we know,

_project or _team - I think both is fine. I never really thought too much about it (team vs. project).

I would go with _team as it is shorter, although #aerogear_org I also like and is 1 character less than team.

We'll need to take a vote here, or come to some conclusion - I think it can be debated forever ;-)


 
it's a project, the "s" on @aerogears always gave to me the sense of a bunch of people behind this to make it happen.

I think the "real problem" is folks think "AeroGears" is the name of the project

Wednesday I gave an AeroGear presentation. Due to the twitter handle of @AeroGears, two of those that asked questions, actually called the project AeroGears :))))
And that's what I have noticed before, which is, I think, the reason why Hylke brought it up.

Unfortunately @AeroGear is taken, but I do think that @AeroGears is misleading - in terms of the name.

However, your "@aerogears always gave to me the sense of a bunch of people behind this to make it happen." is a good thought! Which is believe leads towards _team, right?

Again I never really interpreted too much into the meaning of the twitter handle, besides the fact that folks do not really get our name.


Greetings,
Matthias



 




On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
Actually, @aerogear_project makes sense (see @netty_project)


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
@__aerogear or @_aerogear ?




On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
**If** we're really forced to change, I'd go with @aerogear_project

--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev






--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev