I meant "not clashing". :)
On 20/02/2014 22:17, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
it's a project, the "s" on @aerogears always gave to me the sense of a bunch of people behind this to make it happen.
In that case "@AeroGearers" might have the same effect whilst clashing with the project name? :)
Hylke
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
Actually, @aerogear_project makes sense (see @netty_project)
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
@__aerogear or @_aerogear ?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
**If** we're really forced to change, I'd go with @aerogear_project
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
_______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev