"Several" is very accurate :) I would say so that 99% of the companies disagree on thatOn Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Miguel Lemos <miguel21op@gmail.com> wrote:
+"disable push notifications" +"battery life" +"android" > Google, for instance (I presume you use this).
There are also several companies clamming that their push notifications services (including geo-fencing) drain less battery, etc., etc.On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
Miguel, do you have any references? If there are hundreds posts about it, I would love to read.--On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Miguel Lemos <miguel21op@gmail.com> wrote:
That's not the experience we have... There are hundreds (thousands?) of posts about this matter. There are several strategies to keep the processor alive to do its work and Android (using GCM) minimizes the overload, it's more or less a consensual idea. You'll find in the Internet several articles about this too.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:
Push messages don't drain the battery that much. They all come in over the GCM socket which is refresh every 15 minutes or so.On 04/01/2014 09:22 AM, Miguel Lemos wrote:
?! I can do it worse: uninstall the app because it drains the battery.
Keeping an open socket doesn't drain the battery that badly. IN a (contrived) experiment I had a socket which sent a packet every 5 minutes to the device. Over the course of 5 hours the app didn't even register on things which had drained the battery.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:
On 03/31/2014 02:03 PM, Miiguel Lemos wrote:On Android you can't turn notifications off in the same way as iOS.
> Using the GCM for push notifications has a very important advantage: it minimizes the battery consumption, since it reduces the processor overload, it's not needed to open a socket to check the server on a regular basis, etc. In my opinion this a critical matter, minimizing the probability of the user turning the notifications off.
>
>
> Enviado do meu iPad
>
> No dia 31/03/2014, às 18:51, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> escreveu:
>
>> I would vote for A
>>
>> --
>> abstractj
>>
>> On March 31, 2014 at 10:59:01 AM, Summers Pittman (supittma@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>> Y'all,
>>> So there has been some concerns with the complexity of the build
>>> especially where including the Google GCM (push) libraries
>>> are
>>> concerned. Additionally there have been some requests for a
>>> separate
>>> "push" module which won't need the full aerogear android library.
>>>
>>> The full modularization of the library along with several other
>>> improvements is scheduled for the "2.0" epic.
>>>
>>> So my question is a) Should we make a 2.0 which is only the
>>> modularization sooner and iterate on that a few times before
>>> we include
>>> our improvements in a 3.0 or b) Should we create a "fork" project
>>> which
>>> is only a push module? This new project will get merged back into
>>> the
>>> main project when we have our complete modularizations.
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-- Summers Pittman >>Phone:404 941 4698 >>Java is my crack.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev----
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev