If Luke/Kris want to use Topcoat for a good number of reasons, I am +9001 on that.



On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com> wrote:
Topcoat is a nice and clean CSS framework.

Bootstrap is a messy framework dirtied by some half-assed JS based widgets that don't work well in most cases.

The few widgets we may need could probably be done with pure CSS, or a small jQuery plugin. No need for the bootstrap mess. Also, every site using bootstrap, for the most part, still looks like bootstrap and that's annoying.

On Jul 8, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:

> I'm not a UI specialist, but I do like Topcoat
>
> Lucas Holmquist wrote:
>> Starting a new thread for this:
>>
>>
>>> I would like to reboot the discussion of css frameworks
>>>
>>> the 2 that are in question are bootstrap and topcoat.
>>>
>>> i would like to here why one is "better" than the other. or why the
>>> preference.
>>>
>>> Ready, Go.
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> --
> abstractj
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf