not sure if we should delete it yet - I think it was written by QE to test GCMv2 - but push server is now GCMv3/FCM compliant. I think there is some features missing there. Perhaps it's still good - not really sure.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <jgallaso@redhat.com> wrote:Hi all,I recently create a Docker image of our push FCM proxy, made with Wiremock. Since we are no longer using the FCM proxy in https://github.com/aerogear/push-network-proxies (even the Dockerfile there only consider APNs) I think we could remove it from there and refactor the repository like this:not sure if we should delete it yet - I think it was written by QE to test GCMv2 - but push server is now GCMv3/FCM compliant. I think there is some features missing there. Perhaps it's still good - not really sure.But if Wiremock offers what we need -> fine, better to use things that are supported through a larger community ;-)push-network-proxies/fcm/Dockerfile...apns/Dockerfile...push-network-proxies-template.yml So that we have everything in the same place. I also made a template for Openshift so that we can setup a testing environment for UPS quickly. I think that's the ultimate point of having the mocks together.I like that, having this structure, where FCM is based on Wiremock, right?
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev --Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev