On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com> wrote:

I'm not sure what the reason for this was historically. I think this concept was initally created when we were doing Pipeline.

Wasn't that because you want to share configuration of stores in one DataManager?

But fully agree, it does not make much sense from user's perspective - you can share options object anyway.

I am leaning toward proposing we get rid of this pattern and just make a DataManager object hold 1 store/adapter( sync woud follow suit )

+1 agree