Hi Folks,

Just to y'all know, that is what we are planning for android modules

aerogear-android-core (pipe, auth, autz)
aerogear-android-store
aerogear-android-push
aerogear-android-security|encrypt (keyservices)
aerogear-android-offline
aerogear-android-sync
aerogear-android-messaging

wdyt?

-- Passos


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko@redhat.com> wrote:
I believe there should be a POM depchain for users that are willing just to use
aerogear-android and modular dependencies are for more experienced users.

Similarly to *Adding ShrinkWrap Resolvers to your project* at
https://github.com/shrinkwrap/resolver/blob/master/README.asciidoc

I'm not sure how nicely that would play with Gradle though.

Karel

On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:15:27 -0500
Summers Pittman <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:

> Earlier in development (pre passos) making the Android SDK into modules
> was not a concern (in fact it was an anti-concern).
>
> Now, however, we have a much more complete project and it is time to
> have that discussion.
>
> Right now we have two BIG questions:
>
> 1) Do we want to break out interfaces and implementation?
>
> If we do this then we could reuse a lot of code to make a aerogear-java
> as well.
>
> 2) How granular do we want our modules?
>
> IE If we break out push into aerogear-android-push would that include
> GCM, SimplePush, MQTT, etc in one package or would it look like
> aerogear-android-push-core, aerogear-android-push-mqtt etc.
>
> Thoughts?
>

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev