>Regarding SimplePush/WebPush : is WebPush to be considered (in the future) as replacement of SPS ?

My guess is that yes it could be a replacement and that the Push API [1] will be used with WebPush. But it is still early days yet but I think it would be worth following this development and see what happens.

[1] https://w3c.github.io/push-api/index.html

On 20 November 2014 09:57, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks ! 

The screencast helps a lot to understand all the concepts in 3 minutes.

Regarding SimplePush/WebPush : is WebPush to be considered (in the future) as replacement of SPS ? Will SPS be deprecated ? What will FirefoxOS be using ? 

Sebi

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> wrote:

We've been looking into the WebPush specification[1] a little closer and thought we should share some info about it. 

We created a simple proof of concept to get a better understanding of the specification which can be found here:

https://github.com/danbev/aerogear-webpush-server 

The README.md contains more details regarding the specification and there is a 3 min screen cast [2]. 

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-webpush-http2-01

[2] https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2E1HZ1JnrJfYW90eVBTaGkzSkU/view?usp=sharing

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev