+1 Let's do it.


-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible :)

well... I appreciate them :-) especially when they build are using
timestamp endings ;)


Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029

I don't mind to do regular "dev release", so I am also in fav. of a
timestamp-ish version

-M


thoughts?

On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

hi,

our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1


But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?

NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
(later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
you would call it).

thoughts?

-M

--
Matthias Wessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list

-- qmx


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev