On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:

Good morning,

In the past we had
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/149. Any
specific reason for not having JBoss Logging or Log4j on UPS?

yeah, there were some arguments against adding another dependency (since JUL is part of the Java platform).

Also, as Burr said (see [1]) "we use it, we own it". That means, at some point, we might be less or more the owner (e.g. regarding bugs inside of JBoss logging),

also there cases when the runtime has a different version of JBoss logging versus the one in UPS.

All these seamed not to be worth to go that route, in April this year

With the amount of traffic on UPS, it tends to become more complex to handle
log messages/files.

Thoughts?

Sure, we can revisit this for the future 1.1.x line of the UnifiedPush Server!

-Matthias

[1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-April/007289.html

--

abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf