On Jan 16, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:



On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:


On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, something needs to be done about this. Either moving it out, or having it only enabled with a profile (Summers mentioned this yesterday). 

-1 on profile.

IMO the goal is to create a sync client lib, similar to iOS (which is also on its own repo), so that should not be included on the java server. Eventually we should move out the JS bits as well 


For the JS part I am not sure what's the best way, since it's not just library, it's also demo

Currently the js-client is in a feature branch, https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/diff-sync-client

and the demo is also going into the js cookbook,  https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGJS-268


 
 


On 16 January 2015 at 15:01, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,

should we move the Android client-xmpp to its own repo? Right now, when building the server (and with an incomplete Android setup (aka new, clean repo)) you have to comment it out in order to build the server for running the JS demo.

IMO it would be nice if that gets moved out to something like "aerogear-android-xmpp-client".


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



-- 



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf 

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev