+1 Sounds good. 

On 9 January 2015 at 10:36, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
anyone else ? 

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Daniel Passos <daniel@passos.me> wrote:
+1 for the same Jira project, and use components

-- Passos


On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko@redhat.com> wrote:
+1. Less JIRA instances, the better imho.

Karel

On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 11:32 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> right now we have three different types of 'push servers':
> * UPS
> * SimplePush
> * WebPush Server
>
>
> The first two ones each have their own JIRA, but I was wondering if we
> use the AGPUSH jira for all three.
>
>
> To manage releases and bugs, we will go with different/more
> components, and for the releases, we could do what we do successfully
> on our Cordova project. We can, in JIRA, have releases like:
>
>
> ups-1.3.0
> sps-1.0.0
> wps-0.2.0
>
>
> That way would have all push (server) bits on the same JIRA and
> differentiation is simply done using components and versions as
> discussed above.
>
>
> Any thoughts ?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev