this is likely no longer relevant (see related threads on UPS proposal)

Any other thoughts, around "push content" for GSoC ? 

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
Folks, anybody is more than welcome to give feedback on this.
it may be the new arch for the UPS.next :-) 



On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
For UPS.next, I've drafted this:


It's a good step forward, and in the long run, these modules will also help to easily replace some parts of the server,  e.g. rewrite the "sender" in go 

Any thoughts ?
-M

--
Matthias Wessendorf

github: https://github.com/matzew 
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf



--
Matthias Wessendorf

github: https://github.com/matzew 
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf



--
Matthias Wessendorf

github: https://github.com/matzew 
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf