Does make sense to update Keycloak so it doesn't fail? It seems to be a dependency issue.On 16 June 2017 at 13:16, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:______________________________just tested alpha1, but our legacy keycloak is biting us:-MOn Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:Hi,while WF 11.0 is not yet release, I'd like to see us getting on to WF 11 on the master branchI think that our master branch should be exclusively target the latest from WF stable, which is 11 in the future. So getting to know what's problematic w/ the WF 11-alpha series is a good thing.Comments ?-Matthias--Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf--Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf_________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev --
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev