Oh right, that's true :)

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
Not sure if there is actually a benefit for the user if the implementation of the server is done w/ pure netty, or w/ netty+vert.x on-top 



On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
The vert.x version could also be cool 

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos@redhat.com> wrote:
+1

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,

currently we have the UPS server _and_ the SimplePush server on on cartridge.

Since the UPS now is a full profile dependent server (JMS/HornetQ) is on, I'd like to change remove the SimplePush Server from the cartridge.

For SimplePush, IMO it's best to have a standalone cartridge, that just is Java based and fire up the Netty based server - no WildFly really needed, just MySQL and the SimplePush server


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
-- Passos

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev