do itOn Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:+1
On Apr 15, 2015 3:38 AM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew@apache.org> wrote:_______________________________________________Hi,the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3.Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch.That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this branch..Any thoughts?--Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev