+1 Let's plan that for the 0.4.0 releaseOn Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
_______________________________________________Hi,I noticed the Java Client has an odd group/artifactId:<groupId>org.jboss.aerogear.unifiedpush</groupId> <artifactId>unified-push-java-client</artifactId>
While the other libraries use "org.jboss.aerogear" as groupId, and something like "aerogear-xyz" as their artifactId;The groupId change is not hard, I'd vote to also change it to "org.jboss.aerogear".Regarding the artifactId, I think that "aerogear-unifiedpush-java-client" is pretty much a mouthful, so I think I'd prefer "unifiedpush-java-client"Any thoughts ?-Matthias--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev