Hello, Michi,

I *think* you hit a spot, where we are currently having some issues (see [1]).

Once we agreed on a solution there, it should not be to hard to get that fixed in both: 'master' and the 0.10.x branch of the UnifiedPush Server. 

[1] http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Differences-between-Firefox-OS-quot-native-quot-Push-lib-and-AeroGear-s-Push-adapter-td6195.html


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Michi Oshima <michi.oshima@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I'm trying to adapt the sample code under aerogear-simplepush-unifiedpush-quickstart for my application.  I'm having a problem inside spConnect() function.

When I first ran my code PushManager.register() call was successful, and it returned a pushEndpoint.  But I had mistyped the code somewhere below and I never got to call UPClient.registerWithPushServer(...).

Every subsequent run of the spConnect() function skips the line to call UPClient.registerWithPushServer(...), because PushManager.register() call doesn't return a pushEndpoint.  (That's what you check in this line, correct?)

I'm guessing that I am somehow successfully registered with the simple push server, but not with the unified push server.  I'm very new to AeroGear, so I'm not at all sure.

  1. How should I best recover from this?  
  2. If I'm correct about what's going on, how should I rearrange the code so that I can properly handle the situation where I'm registered with the simple push server but not with the unified push server?
Thank you,

Michi Oshima

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf