Pushed FIRST/TEST impl + actually test case.....
My UNIT test looks (currently) like:-MOn Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:06 PM, tech4j@gmail.com <tech4j@gmail.com> wrote:
I think this is look really good!Here some thoughts, and/or possible additional use-cases* How do we want to handle multiple devices for one user?Instance of 'MobileApplicationInstance'; each device has (per app) a different token;What the apps do themselves, with multiple installs is something different.Twitter, for instance, sends the push-messages to EVERY device - but that's app specific sync(yes, i wish there was something like IMAP, for twitter)* How do we want to handle the other side of unified push (non-native)?** Might just not be there yet, but want to make sure we're still thinking the same thing :-)** Would there be an additional abstraction above this for that?some sub type of 'MobileApplication' can/will cover that "mobile web" (JS client) side:* I'm assuming there is no good way for apps to notify you when they are uninstalled?** As a way of removing clutter in our tables.In apple land these are invalid tokens (see https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/blob/master/src/main/java/com/notnoop/apns/ApnsService.java#L161)So, on a scheduled base they can be remove;Google has similar API (on their MulticastResult (returned by the sender))* Push filtering - I would think IDM would be very good here.** Sending to roles, groups, etc...have different users (==roles), but not spec'd out** When we store the device and app info what sub-system are you thinking?*** I know you were using mongo for some of the prototyping*** Would be possible to abstract to the IDM?yes, it should be possible (desirable) to use IDM - but does not really matterThanks for the feedback!!!-Matthias--On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
I like the current form, but I'm sure we'll get asked about more OO(ish) APIs, like device.send(Message) - is this on the plans?
On 13/03/2013, at 10:28, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> ome more APIs, for some basic (initial) functionality:
>
> https://gist.github.com/matzew/c5fbc23bc97dfead46e1
+1
> User/Dev enrollment can be addressed by (hopefully) reusing the ag-security.
-- qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
blog: http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev--Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf