Hello Erik,

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi,

Made a very simple Java version (based on hibernate) of the sync server.

I think JAX-RS is a good choice for (existing) Java EE applications.

Grizzly/Jersey was just used as an example? Or was it meant to be 'embedded' ? In that case my choice would have been undertow-resteasy:

```

UndertowJaxrsServer undertow = new UndertowJaxrsServer();

undertow.deploy(my_JAX_RS_application);

undertow.start(...);

```

Regarding the 'Car' entity: I am wondering if, on the server, something more like the API discussed in here would be possible:

https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/blob/data-sync/docs/specs/aerogear-data-sync/index.md#java

So, we would have a @Entity for the 'Document', where the content field could be an 'embedded' entity/object;

 

It doesn’t merge so any change in a entity that is old will give a merge conflict. It uses the same ‘protocol’ as couch so WDYT?

Regarding the 'couch-based protocol': In theory that means our current clients (e.g. iOS/JS) would work here too, assuming the JAX-RS server would be following the 'document' model, right?

 

Cheers,

Erik Jan

https://github.com/edewit/sync-server

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev