On Oct 15, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:

So for the next Unified Push Release (0.9) it would be nice if we could have some decent User Management, so I'm bumping this thread again. 
Some existing pointer :

-   this thread :)
-  https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-351 
 https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/6547605 

First point to define is : 
-  What roles do we want ? And what can these Roles do ?

Admin - Can do all things including creating other users
Developer - can create apps and such. no access to the user management UI
User - read only - not sure if this one is needed

-  How can these Roles be created (granted ...)
-  Design 

I think we are still waiting on Hylke for this?   not sure


Seb



On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:



On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Apostolos Emmanouilidis <aemmanou@redhat.com> wrote:
Following the discussion on GitHub [1], here are some points to be
discussed about the user management flow:

- Does it make sense to add a role select field (admin, developer) on
the enrollment page?

hrm, and (perhaps later) a section where to define the roles ? I think it's a good point, but not sure we need all this 'now' :-)
 
- Should we add an additional password field (password confirmation) on
the enrollment page?

yeah, would be nice
 
- I think that the current logged in user shouldn't be available for
deletion

yep, I agree 

[1]:
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server-admin-ui/pull/6



On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 10:15 +0200, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
> A Jira has been created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-351
> And draft structure has been created
> here https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/6547605 that can be used
> as base for the Pull Request.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
>         On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:39:28AM -0300, Bruno Oliveira
>         wrote:
>         > Would be nice to have a 8 hands document on it
>
>
>         who's going to start the pull request on it? it's SPECTIME!
>
>         --
>         qmx
>         _______________________________________________
>         aerogear-dev mailing list
>         aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev