On Tuesday, May 20, 2014, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
The only reason to have checkstyle enabled by default is: if we agree on
which rules should be active or not and provide an specific IDE setup.

Exactly! (Includes headers, formarting etc)

 

Other than that, people like me will skip it. Why? Simple, I'm trying to
solve critical problems and also strugging to figure out why checkstyle
is do care about method lenght.

Same here :-)

 

So to me if you're guys really want to introduce it we need:

- Definition of which rules were supposed to be active
- IDE profiles for Eclipse/IntelliJ
- Make the error messages something clear

+1

 

Otherwise, I'm -∞. It was never discussed here and if it exists on
aerogear-parent is all our fault.

Yep, fully agree

 

On 2014-05-20, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> -1 I'd prefer to have checkstyle enabled by default, and integrate the
> checkstyle into the IDE to avoid having to discover issue later when
> building with maven.
>
>
> On 20 May 2014 20:56, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 on having an specific profile for checkstyle
> >
> > On 2014-05-20, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > w/ the advent of the 0.2.0 parent, we have checkstyle enabled;
> > >
> > > However, I am not that happy, as the default rules are IMO a bit odd
> > (e.g.
> > > the unused imports is pretty nasty when developing)
> > >
> > > We could:
> > > a) get rid of it (perhaps not)
> > > b) disable it on normal execution and only execute it on a release
> > profile
> > > or like that
> > >
> > > right now I am running w/ skip - but that's a bit nasty...
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


--

abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


--
Sent from Gmail Mobile