On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 06:29:21PM -0400, Kris Borchers wrote:
> JS can use anything for the user credential identifiers and I would
> hope the other libs can too! That is just data you pass to the server
> so it should be up to the app dev what the name is based on their
> app's needs and the lib just passes it along. If that is hard coded in
> the Android or iOS libs, IMO it should be changed.
We can configure on the libs,

exactly - and it will be possible to configure

 
but the defaults are inconsistent from my
reading - and like we discussed ad nauseum in the past, defaults matter
:)


The PushServer is based on AeroGear security 1.0.1, and AeroGearUser is gone in there.
With the 1.0.1 + PL The "underlying" PL User uses "loginName".
With AeroGear-Sec 1.0.0 we had the AeroGear User, which used "username".

That's the entire explanation :)


Coming back to the point of "configuration", that's needed on Android and iOS (like the JS bits) for the matter of the "user" in AeroGear-Shiro
is using "username" as well, while the PL "User" has "loginName".


-Matthias


 

--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf