But maybe we don't want the same timeout for a GET than for a POST ? 


On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
pipe level. POST can timeout too ;-)


On Wednesday, January 16, 2013, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
the timeout parameter would be a general property of read() and not related to Paging ? 


On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:
On 01/16/2013 10:23 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> Good point Summers. Might be an obvious question, but there we go. Are we planning to include timeout as parameter? For example: I want to retrieve a list of a bazilion users, and I want to specify the timeout acceptable to wait.
>
> I didn't get the chance to look at each API, just double checking here.
>
+1

I was thinking about this yesterday.  I want to  but was hoping we could
get the "shape" of the API nailed down first before we started hammering
on specifics.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev