-SNAPSHOT is an execption.

So .CR; .FINAL etc :) 

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko@redhat.com> wrote:

On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:40:34 +0200
Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for not having -stable branch
> >
> > +1 for doing version bumps, especially if semantically similar to
> >
> > ...
> > 1.2.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT
> > (bump) 1.2.0.Alpha1
> > 1.2.0.Beta1-SNAPSHOT
> > (bump) 1.2.0.Beta1
> > 1.2.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT
> > (ups, bump quickfix) 1.2.0.Beta2
> > 1.2.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT
> >
>
>
> there will be NO Alpha, BETA, CR, WHAT_NOT :)
>
> we just use numbers.
>

haven't said that WHAT_EVER (except -SNAPSHOT) is necessary :-)

-SNAPSHOT is actually not necessary neither, but provides some free goodies in
Maven world.

>
> > ...
> >
> > +1 on further discussion ;-)
> >
> > Karel
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:51:01 -0500
> > Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > OK, for the sake of peace I will concede to no stable branch so that we
> > can
> > > move on. If it doesn't work well we can always change it.
> > >
> > > Everyone else please voice your opinions still so we can get agreement on
> > > this. We don't all have to agree which is why we discuss. :)
> > >
> > > On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
> > > >> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:56:53PM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
> > > >> > So we haven't talked about this for a while so I thought I would
> > stir
> > > >> > the fire again. Does anyone have any objection to JS managing our
> > > >> > versions as such:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I would like to move what is currently in master to a 1-0-stable
> > branch
> > > >> > Then I would like to update master's build version to 1.1.0-pre
> > > >> > All work is done on the master branch then if the change is
> > applicable
> > > >> > to 1.0.0, it can be cherry-picked into the 1-0-stable branch
> > > >> My take on this:
> > > >>
> > > >> -1 for the stable label - if people want stable, they want releases
> > > >>
> > > >> I do not like -stable as well. And yes. the _final_ TAG is the
> > release. I
> > > >> do agree here!
> > > >
> > > > Can you, and everyone else be more specific here. Do you not like the
> > > > label, or the whole idea of a stable branch?
> > > >
> > > > Not liking "stable branch". For me that is a TAG (immutable).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> +1 for the version bump - java(ish) projects already does this via
> > > >> maven-release-plugin (1.1.0-SNAPSHOT) - but I think -pre isn't clear
> > as
> > > >> -dev is (we use .dev on jruby)
> > > >>
> > > >> I don't have strong feelings for -dev -snapshot,  or what ever :-)
> > > >>
> > > >> IMO both, for example, -dev or -snapshot, make it clear: current dev
> > is
> > > >> here.
> > > >>
> > > >> So, I am happy with -dev or -snapshot (or -pre) :)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> qmx
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > >> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >>
> > > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > >> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > > aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > > aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf