On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:
On 02/03/2015 04:13 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,

I recently noticed that we are (IMO) incorrectly returning 200 (OK):

Since we really do submit an async job here, and its processing may not have been started when we do return the 200 (OK), I'd like to propose a slight change here to instead use 202 (Accepted):


If the team is OK (ha ha) with this, I will track this in JIRA
 This should be OK, I will need to review the Android code. 

I hope no Android code is actually using the SENDER api :-) 

 

Is there any downside to accepting results on the client side? (As opposed to configuring the library comply with a certain version of UPS)

Not sure what you are asking here
 



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


-- 
Summers Pittman
>>Phone:404 941 4698
>>Java is my crack.

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf