I knew my stable branch idea wasn't totally crazy :)

+1 for policy to discuss

On Mar 26, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:

> Well, in this case you are just reinforcing Kris' idea of having a stable branch - and now I can see the trouble :)
>
> How about me writing a tag/branch policy like the versioning one, so y'all can comment on it?
>
> On 26/03/2013, at 13:02, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I feel like I'm missing something here but think this is a little confusing. I'll try to explain...
>>
>>> 1.0.0 -> 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT
>> So, our master branch would have version 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT after the release. Looking at the version 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT someone might think that this branch will only contain patches/bugfixes and not new features.
>> As development will start pretty much at once after a release, chances are that we will be adding new features before getting bug reports. For that reason I thought that we would directly dump the minor version to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT, and bugfixes would be done on master as mentioned earlier. At some point we would create a branch for 1.0.1 and cherry-pick the bugfixes to be included, and we would make that branches version be 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT. More fixes could be included in that branch as needed, and when we have enough fixes, or very critical ones, we would release 1.0.1.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26 March 2013 16:34, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com> wrote:
>> OK. I guess having in progress versions not match is ok.
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
>>
>>> exactly, you won't use SNAPSHOT, maven forces you to do so, and has a dedicated repo for intermediate "on the go" release"
>>>
>>> On 26/03/2013, at 12:31, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think it does apply. I need a version to put in my package.json on master to indicate it's the next version in progress.
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26/03/2013, at 12:21, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -SNAPSHOT makes my skin crawl. Can we use the more semver way of -pre?
>>>>>
>>>>> er, this is maven, ignore it - doesn't apply to JS, nor iOS
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> qmx
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> qmx
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> --
> qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev