>would it make sense to extract it, as a demo/example?
We could do that if we find a need for it later. But at the moment I think we have enough to maintain as it is. 

On 3 December 2014 at 11:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:


On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:46 AM, danielbevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd like to delete the  restsync
<https://github.com/danbev/aerogear-sync-server/tree/differential-synchronization/restsync>
module from the differential-synchronization branch.
As mentioned previously in this thread, I thought it might be nice to have
it around but it is causing more confusion and not really being used.

+1
 

Let me know anyone objects. If not I'd like to delete it tomorrow.

would it make sense to extract it, as a demo/example?
But well, not sure that makes sense since it may not be maintained, right ?


 

Thanks,

/Dan



--
View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-aerogear-sync-server-repository-tp9016p10240.html
Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev