agree; overall looks good. Perhaps also worth to revisit versions, as stated in [1]

-M

[1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2013-August/004503.html

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:

Overall looks good Dan.

Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to prioritise tasks for 0.9.0 and 1.0.0 of the SimplePush
> Server.
>
> The suggestions for tasks so far are the following:
> 0.9.0    https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12319749
> 1.0.0    https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12319748
>
> If there are any client library needs that would benefit from have a
> feature in 0.9.0 let me know and we can arrange that.
>
> These are only suggestion on my part and let me know if you think things
> should be moved around or added.
>
> /Dan
>
>

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--
abstractj



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev