On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com> wrote:
here's a scenario.
A user creates an "Application" then adds a new "iOS Variant" to it.
they decide they need to rename this Variant since they didn't name it very well.
There is currently no way of renaming/ updating the description of this variant without re-sending the Certificate/pass phrase. this would be the same for Android and Simple Push, just substitute google key and channels
Is this really a problem ? Since before an update I assume you do a GET which will contain the Certificate/pass phrase, and then just doing an update passing the whole object again ... I might be missing sometyhing obvious here.
i have all the info, was hoping to avoid having to resend the certificate/other stuff again.
Ok I see, with the current model that is not really possible (saying trivially) . We could extract all this info (cert/pass whatever) into a different model/class and just having a 1-1 relation making the update on the variant more simple. But I would like to have Matzew feedback on this.
I think the same goes for renaming the Application construct?
Though it just contains an extra "description" field, so it may not be worth it…
_______________________________________________
Would like to hear Matthew ideas on this as well from an API design point of view. :)
Hylke
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev