On May 21, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:

What about the following



Specific Components

The following are very specific to a certain part of the "work":

  • UnifiedPush-server
  • UnifiedPush-ios
  • UnifiedPush-android
  • UnifiedPush-javascript
  • UnifiedPush-admin
  • UnifiedPush-java(-sender)
  • UnifiedPush-aps
aps or apns?
  • UnifiedPush-gcm
  • UnifiedPush-simplePush (=== connection TO (various) SP networks)
  • SimplePush-server
  • SimplePush-javascript (=== client, I think there is only a JS client)


Now, various of the above "component" have similar concerns, like security or documentation.

Generic components (e.g. used like a tag)

  • security
  • Documentation
  • Examples
  • PushNetwork (e.g. when investigating for adding new supported ones...)
  • OpenShift (support for UP / SP)
  • Tooling (== Tooling / RAD )

Perhaps these are really more tags, but I am fine in "abusing" these components as tags.


This looks great! GO GO GO GO!


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas@redhat.com> wrote:
+1 - I added a comment related to this.

Also, I'm not sure if Jira has "Component Themes" like it has other things, but there will be a lot of shared components between the various AG Jira's.  I think it will be important to be consistent where possible (capitalization, abbreviations, naming, etc...).

On May 20, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:

> Not sure what's the main idea, but for security we can do something like:
>
> AGPUSH-your-favorite-component-here, security
>
> If we start to create new components for security per project, it will
> add more confusion. At least to me.
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> added a few comments
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Daniel Bevenius
>> <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>    Looks good!
>>
>>
>>    On 16 May 2013 18:38, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com
>>    <mailto:kris@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>        Hey all,
>>
>>        Please take a look at
>>        https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-11 and let me know if you
>>        would add/change/remove any suggested components I have
>>        suggested there.
>>
>>        Thanks!
>>
>>        _______________________________________________
>>        aerogear-dev mailing list
>>        aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>        https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    aerogear-dev mailing list
>>    aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev