On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 01:59:31PM +0100, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently in the Java Sender Library the pushApplicationId and the
> masterSecret are part of the UnifiedPushMessage object. I would like to
> move these 2 fields to the Sender object and add it to its Builder API, to
> have something like :
>
> JavaSender defaultJavaSender = new
> SenderClient.Builder("http://localhost:8080/ag-push")
>                 .pushApplicationId("c7fc6525-5506-4ca9-9cf1-55cc261ddb9c")
>                 .masterSecret("8b2f43a9-23c8-44fe-bee9-d6b0af9e316b")
>                 .build();
>
>
> Why ?
>
>    - Regarding design, these 2 fields are more part of the sender rather
>    than the message itself
>    - This is a first step to externalize the configuration, so we could
>    have later, for instance, `JavaSender defaultJavaSender = new
>    SenderClient.Config("path.to.config(or resource stream")
I'm assuming a new Whatever.Config() will yield a Config instance, so
this looks wrong.
Yeah wrong naming, Dan come already with something better Sender.withConfig(....)  

>
> What does it change ?
>
>    - It only concerns the Java Sender, we do not touch the Rest Sender API
>    here.
>    - A Sender instance is now bounded to a particular PushApp, so if we
>    want to send a message to another PushApp we should :
>    -   Create a new instance of the Sender
>    -   Expose setters to update the config.
>
> So , wdyt ?

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev