On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:30 AM, tolis emmanouilidis <tolisemm@gmail.com> wrote:
2014-08-28 8:50 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>

On our Face2Face meeting we briefly talked about this and I think the "accept header" solution was the one that had most fans. I think QMX added that it is better for migration. One thing we were not clear on (I think): What are HATEOS defined semantics?

What exactly do you mean by "HATEOAS defined semantics"; Is it in the roadmap to use a HATEOAS implementation (maybe Hal) or Json hyper schema in UPS rest?

not sure, someone added that to the meeting notes :)


aerogear-dev mailing list

Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf