instead of storing all sync items underneath the AEROGEAR instance, we could have a AGDATASYNC JIRA instance. I think this makes it nicer to organize, especially with releases. That's what we did with AGPUSH for the 'push feature', which obviously is available across platforms.

-Matthias

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi All,

we have created JIRA tasks for the data sync roadmaps [1][2]. 

While creating them we noticed that we are using different component names in JIRA for the our projects:

AEROGEAR:  

Uses 'data-sync' as the component name:

https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322676

AGIOS

Uses 'sync' as the component name:

https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322678

AGDROID

Uses 'datasync' as the component name:

https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322677

AGJS

Uses 'data-sync' as the component name:

https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322679

I would be nice to makes these consistent across the projects. Let me know which you prefer and I'll make the changes needed. 

I'm personally +1 for 'datasync'

[1] http://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearDataSync

[2] http://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearConflictResolution

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--

Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev