That list of variants to choose from could potentially be extremely loooooong

On Feb 27, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons@redhat.com> wrote:

Hey,

After some discussion with Sebastien, here's the first iteration of the design: https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/tests/send-message.png

It shows a summary at the end of the form for review, as sending messages can go very badly if a mistake was made in the form. It may look a bit excessive with the different pages, but it's an important case with actions that can't be undone.

Let me know your thoughts and whether this is at all possible.

Hylke


On 26/02/2014 09:15, Sebastien Blanc wrote:

Hi,

An update : here the latest screenshot of the current UI : 

And also now you can test it for real since I deployed a new version that manage the sending :  : http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com  (admin /123) 

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:

Hello Sebi,

that looks really nice!

Hylke can you take a look at the first version, from a UX persons view?

Thanks!

Matthias

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

I started to work on a new "Compose Message" page. The idea is that you can add criterias to your message , as you can see here on this screenshot : 

 

I've also deployed a live version but *DICSLAIMER* this is just UI / Mockup work sending will not work for now : http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com  => Select an App and you will have a "Copomse Message" link on the next page.

Feedback is welcome.

Sebi

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons@redhat.com> wrote:

Sounds good.
Let me know if you need any help with the mockup designs. ;)

Sure, I will ASAP submit a "raw" mockup on which you can work on.

What I would like is a dedicated page for the "Compose Push Message" feature.

We wil have a criteria section to choose to who we want to send the message. I really like for instance how Jira do that like here http://postimg.org/image/5ur2j9wh5/ 

In our case we could have the drop downs for : "Variants", "Device Type", "Alias" and "Categories"

And then below w will have a free text area to send a custom value.

Hylke

On 23/02/2014 12:08, Sebastien Blanc wrote:

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:

Hi,

over the weekend I spoke w/ a friend: His company is doing some mobile (iOS/Android) apps which also support receiving push notifications.

Two examples he told me. After receiving push notification:

* One of their apps basically fetches the latest version of a CSV file, stored on a public HTTP Server.

* Another app is used to tell sales guys new brochure files (PDF) are available on a protected resource of a webserver (which they _can_ than download from w/in the app, if the like to)

The company build a simple console (PHP) which allows them to send new push messages, when ever their customers want to.

I showed them our UnifiedPush Server and its usage via our AeroDoc example (iOS / backend). They really liked the UnifiedPush Server. Especially that it does store all the device metadata. 

But since a lot of their mobile apps don't have a backend requirement, they would still have to use their own console (which than connects to UPS)  for submitting all the push messages they want.

This brings me to [AGPUSH-38] and I really think we should implement that feature. Not only for sending test messages! If our UnifiedPush Server allows its users to simple send push messages to all of their mobile apps, it would make the server even more attractive.

I regret a bit that I was against [AGPUSH-38] in the beginning, I guess that's due to my Java enterprise background, where you typically find complex setups, and server talk to servers :-(

Anyways, now I really think that the UPS has to have such a 'send push' facility inside of the Admin UI :-) I believe that we could reach way more potential users with something like that

+9001 and I already started thinking about this for a while. I will try to submit some mockups/POCs this week so we can discuss that and I have  quickly a first working version on master.

Any thoughts?

Greetings,

Matthias 

[AGPUSH-38] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-38

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev