On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 06:44:43PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com>wrote:
> > Maybe I'm totally wrong but using EJB  on a plain old Tomcat/Jetty will be
> > the same issue as using JMS, no ? (Or by Tomcat when meant TomEE ? )
> JMS integration is a bit harder (separated broker), compared to deploying
> an embedded EJB container (e.g. Apache OpenEJB).
> I have always thought that we do target - first - the WebProfile of JavaEE
> 6 (which contains EJB, but not JMS)

I think the question is: can't we avoid **both** JMS and EJB/CDI? I'm
probably missing something, but for me I can't see the reason beyond
just using it for the sake of it...

like using plain JDBC and handwritten factories, instead of JPA/EJB/CDI ?


aerogear-dev mailing list

Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf