On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:
I don't mind relying on commons-fileupload.On Monday, April 15, 2013 10:00:14 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've created a gist to discuss possible ways to implement
> multipart-support in AeroGear Controller:
> https://gist.github.com/danbev/fec1fe498cabdf0aef6a
>
> Any suggestion/comments are welcome.
>
> /Dan
same here, not sure if still (good) maintained, since it (multipart) is now part of the servlet spec;
It would be nice (but more work) if we could marshall objects with
multipart like we can with JSON. For fields which aren't files that is
easy. For fields which are files we would have some behavior to define.
I'm all for making easy bindings for common types (maybe byte[], File,
InputStream, BufferedImage) and having an easy way to inject custom
processing (perhaps with annotations).that would be nice, to have an easy mapping
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev