Would AeroGear.Messaging be to confusing, since this is in the gist

Messaging

Current thinking is that the AeroGear Notifier will NOT be used with messaging. But that's not really determined yet... Most-likely supporting STOMP over WebSocket would be the way to go. Message brokers usually support STOMP (-> HortnetQ, Apache ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ,...).


On Dec 3, 2012, at 6:50 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:

I like the idea of AeroGear.Notifier (guess who suggested the name? :)) but it sounds a lot like something read-only

How about having AeroGear.Messaging, and implementing the Notifier API on top of it?

On Dec 3, 2012, at 5:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

any further comments?

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,

yesterday some folks of the team meet, to talk about WebSocket - more
generally (HTML5) connectivity.

Here is a write-up from the meeting:
https://gist.github.com/dd6e3c2da08830776996

Feedback and comments are welcome - Please use the comment function on
that gist!

Cheers!
Matthias

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-- qmx


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev