Great, lets go with 'AG-' prefix then.á




On 11 January 2013 18:24, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:

On 11/01/2013, at 15:10, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com> wrote:
> I guess what I meant is I'm not specifically +1 for X- prefix but just some sort of prefix in general. It just makes it easier for devs when looking through headers to see what is being sent. Even something like AG- or AeroGear- would be better IMO than no prefix.

d'oh, +1 - thought I've typed itů

AG- looks nicer - less bandwidth ;)

-- qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev