This seems that makes for pretty good User Experience...What about "Built-in" Keycloak instead of Default?
I guess "Keycloak URL" will disappear when "Built-in" is chosen, right?Let me know, Brno, if you would appreciate help with prototyping that UI.On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:Question: What would be the best for you generate an ups-realm.json file
for download based on the current host or let the developer specify the
redirect URL?I would say, let's use the current host, like we do when we generate the code snippets examples.
I'm thinking about it
https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/commit/db7639566e75f01a8cc79ff18f22daa61cc9cb30#diff-b8df82f22499b0118c37e0e363c4342aR80
On 2014-11-17, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Good morning amazing people.
> >>
> >> While working on AGPUSH-1047, I was wondering if would make sense on
> >> having a configuration page before users getting started.
> >>
> >
> > you speak out of my mind, I thought about the same in the train, when I
> > saw you changes on GH (the URL replacements to KC and KC.js).
> >
> > We somehow should have a dialog right after installation, that asks
> > "default" or "custom" KC server etc
> >
>
> where
> * default would be -> KC and UPS on same server;
> custom: Provide URL for KC server
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I thinking about the current problem on decoupling our server from
> >> Keycloak[1] and OpenShift.
> >>
> >> What is the current proposal for the initial setup?
> >>
> >> 1. Developer create an UPS instance on OpenShift
> >> 2. Visit https://myups-abstractj.rhcloud.com/ag-push
> >> 3. The application automagically redirect to the configuration page with
> >> options to skip or enter the URL for the Keycloak server.
> >> 4. App changes the keycloak.json/ups-realm.json file based on the URL
> >> provided.
> >>
> >> Does it make sense?
> >>
> >
> > yes, it absolutely does!
> >
> >
> >>
> >> [1] -
> >> https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/commit/db7639566e75f01a8cc79ff18f22daa61cc9cb30#diff-f2f2799554171f7ce321785716b71244R3
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> abstractj
> >> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev